Showing posts with label DEIS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DEIS. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

Vancouver Needs Your Comment




Friday, January 22nd is the deadline for the Vancouver Tesoro-Savage Oil Terminal EIS comment period.

Friends of the Columbia Gorge have broken down some talking points to help us write our comments. It's very easy to pick a topic and expand on it.

Summary: The Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Tesoro Savage oil terminal explains that Tesoro’s project would have significant direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts on communities along the Columbia River. Rail communities and the Columbia River Gorge would be exposed to public safety risks from likely derailments, oil spills, fires and explosions. The DEIS does not adequately address the project’s contribution to global warming, and the mitigation measures proposed in the DEIS are vague, speculative, and unlikely to be successful. Despite these defects, the DEIS confirms that the Tesoro project is a threat to public safety and the environment—giving the Washington Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC) and Governor Jay Inslee more than adequate justification for rejecting Tesoro’s project.
The full text of the DEIS is available for download

Comment at the official EFSEC EIS website: https://ts.efsec.wa.gov/

Sunday, October 18, 2015

Did the DEIS's properly address your scoping comment??

by Arnie Martin,   Citizens for a Clean Harbor

The draft Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) for the Westway Expansion Project and the Imperium Terminal Services Expansion Project [crude oil terminals] in Grays Harbor, were published Aug 31, 2015,  starting  the  60-day public comment period. The comment period starts August 31, 2015 and ends October 29, 2015.


The scoping comments made 2 years ago were to be a guide for the Department of Ecology in writing the Environmental Impact Study (EIS).

Now is the time to go back and look at the scoping comment(s) you submitted back in 2013/2014.

1. Review your scoping comments (comments are in Volume 2, Appendix A). 
    a.       Search for your comments by expanding the “Appendix A” list by clicking on the “+” to its left, then clicking on “Index of Comment Submissions Sorted by Commenter Name”, then scroll down to your name.
    b.      Carefully review your comment(s).

2. Were your concerns addressed in the draft EIS?
    a.       Search (using your exact words in the scoping comment – or a subset of those words) to find what the DEIS says in response to your comment.
    b.      Using “Ctrl” – “Shift” – “F” is the best way to find something buried in the text of the Volume 1.

3. Were your concerns adequately resolved?
    a.      Has the DEIS put in requirements that would have the project proponents change their plans to reduce the effects of the problem addressed in your comment?           
    b.      Does the DEIS just add some words that say that occurrence is “very unlikely” or “highly unlikely”. 
    c.      Does the DEIS simply have a sentence that states: “Compliance with the applicable regulations and permits described above is expected to reduce impacts on land and shoreline use. There would be no unavoidable and significant adverse impacts.” ?
    d.      Does the DEIS fail totally to mention your concerns?
    e.      Be aware that the studies used to prepare the DEIS are included in volumes 2 and 3.

4. Responding to the DEIS
    a.       If you don’t believe that such comments adequately address the concerns you raised in the scoping comment, call their attention to the comment, using the comment submission number assigned to your comment. 
    b.      Point out the inadequacy of their DEIS, relative to your scoping comment. They will have to respond to your comment, and modify the DEIS text for incorporation into the Final EIS.
  
Both Draft EISs are available on the Ecology website, www.ecy.wa.gov/GraysHarbor. In addition to the draft documents, the website also has links to fact sheets in English and Spanish. These fact sheets summarize key issue areas, the environmental review process, and the Westway and the Imperium [ now REG] expansion projects. The website has information on submitting comments and a link to the online comment form.

Comments that do not identify a specific project will be considered for both projects. All comments are valued equally.  Comments can be submitted:

By mail at:
Westway and Imperium Terminal Services Expansion Projects EISs
c/o ICF International
710 Second Street, Suite 550
Seattle, WA 98104

Online at: https://public.commentworks.com/cwx/westwayimperiumcommentform/


Wednesday, October 14, 2015

Vancouver firefighters oppose oil terminal at port- media links

 
 The Port of Vancouver, looking east from Terminal 5

Incredible testimony from the firefighter union at the Port of Vancouver. The ILWU president also testified against oil in front of a packed house opposed to oil.

Vancouver firefighters oppose oil terminal at port

KOIN-  Port of Vancouver terminal would be nation's largest oil-by-rail terminal


Firefighters: Oil train terminal would put too many lives at risk KGW - video



Vancouver firefighters union opposes oil terminal at port

The Columbian- It cites threats to public safety posed by project proposed at Port of  Vancouver


All stories mentioned the impending release of the DEIS on the 24th of November.

Friday, October 9, 2015

Aberdeen DEIS hearing and rally- pictures and media links



Hundreds listen to Rally speakers

King 5 – “Critics of all ages sound off on oil trains”  - video


Fawn Sharp and Quinault drummers 

The Daily World – “Officials hear overwhelming opposition to crude terminals”

 


 
 Aberdeen City Councilman Alan Richrod discusses oil threat

The Daily World – “Rally riles oil denouncers amid public hearing”


 
 Hundreds Rally against crude oil on the Harbor

KXRO News Radio – “Rally against oil at draft EIS public hearing”                            


                                                               Returning to hearing session

Scoping specifically asked Ecology to study the impacts along the rail line throughout the state, but the DRAFT EIS totally ignores everything outside of 59 miles of Aberdeen.    The Department of Ecology and the City of Hoquiam do not have the right to sacrifice other communities for the benefit of special interests. BNSF averages one non-yard accident per million miles.  On that basis, we conclude these terminals will lead to 44 non-yard accidents in 20 years.  Serious accidents are guaranteed.
              
          The stench created by oil was also completely unaddressed, even though it can have major impacts on the community's health and economic viability.

** more media links will be added as we collect them


h/t to RD Grunbaum and Zoltan Grossman for pics,  WEC for links, and Don Steinke for commentary!!