Showing posts with label Protest. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Protest. Show all posts

Monday, May 25, 2015

State To Shell: Long-Term Moorage Of Arctic Drill Rig Unconstitutional

 Shell's Polar Pioneer rig juts out into the West Waterway of Seattle's Duwamish River.
Shell's Polar Pioneer rig juts out into the West Waterway of Seattle's Duwamish River.

State To Shell: Long-Term Moorage Of Arctic Drill Rig Unconstitutional


KUOW.org             May 22, 2015 

State officials said Friday that it's unconstitutional for Shell Oil to store its Arctic drilling rig at the Port of Seattle's Terminal 5.

The Washington Department of Natural Resources sent a letter to Shell Friday, informing the energy giant that short-term mooring of Shell's Polar Pioneer rig at the Port is fine.

But the state constitution prohibits long-term mooring outside of harbors.

The Polar Pioneer, a massive floating platform 400 feet long and 292 feet wide, is more than twice as wide as the official harbor area at Terminal 5, where it arrived last week. And for most of Terminal 5's length, its 130-foot-wide harbor area is completely covered by a dock that extends over the water and the state-owned land beneath it.

The Polar Pioneer juts out into the West Waterway of the Duwamish River, where long-term private use is forbidden by the state constitution. ("The state shall never give, sell or lease to any private person, corporation or association any rights whatever in the waters beyond such harbor lines," Article XV reads.)

"A ship could moor long-term inside the harbor line but not outside the harbor line," DNR spokesman Joe Smillie said. "The state constitution is pretty explicit in forbidding the state from giving, selling or leasing the rights to use the waters outside harbor lines for long-term moorage or other commercial uses."

Smillie said DNR determines what constitutes "long-term" on a case-by-case basis.

The DNR letter asked Shell how long it plans to keep its rig at Terminal 5 and requested an answer by June 1.

Friday, April 17, 2015

sHELLno Protests Giant Oil Rig in Port Angeles Harbor

 
Polar Pioneer -- The offshore oil drilling platform Polar Pioneer, piggybacking on the cargo deck ship Blue Marlin, arrives in Port Angeles Harbor on April 17, 2015. It was greeted by a "Mosquito Fleet" of protesters in kayaks and boats belonging to Greenpeace. The drilling rig will be eventually be towed to Seattle where other protests are planned in May. Plans call for the Polar Pioneer to be transported to Alaska for exploratory drilling in the Chukchi Sea.
Previous Photo
1 / 7
Next Photo
Click here to zoom...
Keith Thorpe/Peninsuila Daily News
Protest boats approach the Polar Pioneer offshore oil platform and cargo deck ship Blue Marlin as they are hauled to their anchorage in Port Angeles Harbor.    see site for video


By Chris McDaniel and Paul Gottlieb

Peninsula Daily News
April 17. 2015     

PORT ANGELES — A 355-foot-tall offshore oil rig entered Port Angeles Harbor at 7:10 a.m. for a two-week stay, and it was met with protesters in kayaks and inflatable boats obeying a Coast Guard safety perimeter around the huge vessel.

Greenpeace protesters wrapped up early in the afternoon, said Cassidy Sharp, Greenpeace spokeswoman for the Arctic Works campaign. It was uncertain if protesters will be active on Sunday.

Protest was made without incident, said Coast Guard spokesman Lt. Dana Warr.

“Everybody went out and protested peacefully and respected the federal regulations around the vessels, and they stayed safe during the vessel's maneuvering for position for anchorage,” Warr said.

“We consider that a success for the day.”

The Polar Pioneer, being transported piggyback on the MV Blue Marlin, a heavy-lift ship, is expected to anchor in the harbor for routine outfitting for about two weeks before being floated to Seattle.

It arrived in the Strait of Juan de Fuca before daybreak to end a Pacific Ocean journey from Malaysia.

The oil rig will be moved from the Blue Marlin sometime in the next few days before it is outfitted, said Megan Baldino, Shell Oil Company spokeswoman.

She said that Port Angeles Harbor offered ideal protection for the Blue Marlin during a heavy lift operation.

Owned by Transocean Ltd., the drilling rig was escorted by a variety of enforcement agency vessels including Coast Guard control boats and a Clallam County Sheriff's Office patrol boat.

About eight members of Greenpeace left for the rig in boats that also included journalists at about 5 a.m.

The structure is 355 feet from the water line to the top, according to Baldino.

Click here for specifications and data on the Polar Pioneer: http://www.deepwater.com/Documents/RigSpecs/Polar%20Pioneer.pdf

As the Polar Pioneer was making its way into the harbor at about 7 a.m., about 30 members of the protest group Shell No Action boarded kayaks and inflatables to greet it.

Eric Ross of Shell No Action Coalition called the protest a training run for the “festival of resistance” in Seattle on May 16-18.

The ocean oil-drilling process is “a travesty for the environment” and is “damning the next generation,” Ross said.

Warr said that the Coast Guard was assisted by the Clallam County Sheriff's Office, Port Angeles Police Department and U.S. Customs and Border Patrol, which, like the Coast Guard, are agencies of the Department of Homeland Security.

The Polar Pioneer will be guarded by Shell Oil security during its stay in the harbor, Warr said, adding that Shell Oil also has a security ship.

The protesters oppose the resumption of exploratory oil drilling in Arctic waters off Alaska. They say exploration companies are ill-equipped in the event of a spill.

The Polar Pioneer is one of two drill rigs Shell hopes to use for exploratory drilling in the Chukchi Sea.

Greenpeace protesters were constrained from approaching closer than about 1,100 yards to the Polar Pioneer or Blue Marlin by Alaska U.S. District Court Judge Sharon Gleason, who issued a temporary restraining order April 11 barring Greenpeace from interfering with the Blue Marlin and the Polar Pioneer.

Six activists with Greenpeace boarded the Blue Marlin and Polar Pioneer in the Pacific Ocean about 750 miles from Hawaii last week.

They returned to a nearby Greenpeace ship just hours before a federal judge in Alaska ordered them off the Blue Marlin at the request of Royal Dutch Shell.

Protesters from other groups, including people from Port Angeles, Sequim and Port Townsend could venture closer.

The safety zones are 500 yards when the rig is in motion and 100 yards away when it is stationary.

“It was good to see that everybody respected those boundaries,” Warr said.

“At the same time we are glad that everybody was able to express their opinion,” he said.

“Hopefully, we can continue the same relationship during the time it is in Puget Sound.”

Shell No Action protesters held signs as they coursed around the safety zone this morning.

Some of the signs read “Arctic Drilling Equals Climate Chaos” and “Shell Oil Kills.”

“We are super pleased to have everyone” participating, Sharp said.

________

Sequim-Dungeness Valley Editor Chris McDaniel can be reached at 360-681-2390, ext. 5052 or at cmcdaniel@peninsuladailynews.com.

Senior Staff Writer Paul Gottlieb can be reached at 360-452-2345, ext. 5060, or at pgottlieb@peninsuladailynews.com.





Wednesday, March 4, 2015

Canada to gag Oil foes? Short-line rails seek tax credits

Franke James Harper Afraid Of

DeSmogBlog.com     3/03/15

This is a guest post by David Suzuki

A scientist, or any knowledgeable person, will tell you climate change is a serious threat for Canada and the world. But the RCMP has a different take. A secret report by the national police force, obtained by Greenpeace, both minimizes the threat of global warming and conjures a spectre of threats posed by people who rightly call for sanity in dealing with problems caused by burning fossil fuels.

The RCMP report has come to light as federal politicians debate the “anti-terrorism” Bill C-51. Although the act wouldn’t apply to “lawful advocacy, protest, dissent and artistic expression,” its language echoes the tone of the RCMP report. It would give massive new powers to the Canadian Security Intelligence Service to prevent any person or group from “undermining the security of Canada,” including “interference with critical infrastructure” and the “economic or financial stability of Canada.” And it would seriously infringe on freedom of speech and expression. The new CSIS powers would lack necessary public oversight.

The RCMP report specifically names Greenpeace, Tides Canada and the Sierra Club as part of “a growing, highly organized and well-financed anti-Canada petroleum movement that consists of peaceful activists, militants and violent extremists who are opposed to society’s reliance on fossil fuels.” The report downplays climate change, calling it a “perceived environmental threat” and saying members of the “international anti-Canadian petroleum movement … claim that climate change is now the most serious global environmental threat and that climate change is a direct consequence of elevated anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions which, reportedly, are directly linked to the continued use of fossil fuels.” It also makes numerous references to anti-petroleum and indigenous “extremists”.

Language in the RCMP report and Bill C-51 leaves open the possibility that the act and increased police and CSIS powers could be used against First Nations and environmentalists engaging in non-violent protests against pipelines or other environmentally destructive projects.

As University of Ottawa law professor Craig Forcese points out, with its reference to “foreign-influenced activities within or relating to Canada that are detrimental to the interests of Canada,” the anti-terrorism law could be used in the case of a “foreign environmental foundation funding a Canadian environmental group’s secret efforts to plan a protest (done without proper permits) in opposition to the Keystone Pipeline Project.” Considering that government ministers have already characterized anti-pipeline protesters as “foreign-funded radicals”, that’s not a stretch. The RCMP could consider my strong support for greenhouse gas emissions reductions and renewable energy as “anti-petroleum”.

Combatting terrorism is important, but Canada is not at war, and we already have many laws — and enhanced police powers — to deal with terrorist threats. More importantly, the RCMP report fuels the legitimate fear that the new law could be used to curtail important civil liberties, affecting everyone from religious minorities to organized labour and First Nations to environmentalists.

If, for any reason, someone causes another person harm or damages infrastructure or property, that person should —and would, under current laws — face legal consequences. But the vast majority of people calling for rational discussion about fossil fuels and climate change — even those who engage in civil disobedience — aren’t “violent anti-petroleum extremists.” They’re people from all walks of life and ages who care about our country, our world, our families and friends and our future.

Canada is much more than a dirty energy “superpower”. Many people from different cultures and backgrounds and with varying political perspectives have built a nation that is the envy of the world. We have a spectacular natural environment, enlightened laws on issues ranging from equal rights to freedom of speech, robust social programs and a diverse, educated population. We mustn’t sacrifice all we have gained out of fear, or give up our hard-won civil liberties for a vague and overreaching law that, as Forcese and University of Toronto law professor Kent Roach point out, “undermines more promising avenues of addressing terrorism.”

Pollution and climate change caused by excessive burning of fossil fuels are real threats, not the people who warn that we must take these threats seriously. And while we must also respond to terrorism with the strong tools already in place, we have to remember that our rights and freedoms, not fear, are what keep us strong.

Written with contributions from David Suzuki Foundation Senior Editor Ian Hanington.
Learn more at www.davidsuzuki.org.

New bills seek to strengthen crude-by-rail safety, extend short-line tax credit

Progressive Railroading  03/04/15

from middle of article ........U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) yesterday introduced the Short Line Railroad Rehabilitation and Investment Act of 2015, which would extend the Section 45G short-line tax credit that expired at 2014's end.

The bill, which garnered six co-sponsors, is a companion to H.R. 721 that was introduced Feb. 4 by U.S. Reps. Lynn Jenkins (R-Kan.), Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.), Rodney Davis (R-Ill.) and Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.). The bills propose to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify and extend the track credit through 2015, and perhaps beyond. The Section 45G provision enables regionals and short lines to claim a tax credit of 50 cents for every dollar invested in track rehabilitation, up to a cap equal to $3,500 times their total track miles.

"Small railroads provide a critical service to communities and businesses across Oregon, and this bill means continued investment in important infrastructure," said Wyden, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, in a press release. "The short line rail credit empowers railroads to make investments in the first and last mile of what is often a transcontinental journey for goods destined for factories, grain elevators, mills and other vital parts of the economy."....   more here


Links:

Uneasy in N.J.:  Federal DOT Report Predicting More Crude and Ethanol Derailments is a Call for Action     According to the American Association of Railroads, only 15 percent of the 92,000 tankers cars on the rails today meet the latest industry standards. 

 


Read more here: http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2015/03/03/4162682_leaking-cars-vapor-pressure-vessel.html?rh=1#storylink=cpy

Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Canada targets tar sands critics in new criminalization of dissent

Canada targets tar sands critics in new criminalization of dissent

Canada’s Harper rĂ©gime has invented the new crime of being a member of an “anti-Canadian petroleum movement,” and equating such a stance with terrorism. Evidently believing it is in danger of losing the fight against pipeline projects intended to speed up Alberta tar sands production, its response is to place environmentalists under surveillance.

A secret report prepared by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the country’s national police agency, claims that public activism against the problems caused by oil and gas extraction is a growing and violent threat to Canada’s national security. The report goes so far as to challenge the very idea that human activity is causing global warming or that global warming is even a problem. At least 97 percent of environmental scientists agree that human activity is causing global warming. The basis on which a police force can declare otherwise is surely not clear.

 
The Alberta tar sands (photo by Howl Arts Collective, Montréal)

Whether police officials truly believe they understand the global climate better than scientists who are expert in the field or are merely providing “intelligence” [sic] that the government of Prime Minister Stephen Harper wants to hear, I will leave to others more familiar than I with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Regardless, the RMCP report, leaked to Greenpeace, makes for amusing reading. For example:
“[T]here is an apparent growing international anti-Canadian petroleum movement. In their literature, representatives of the movement claim climate change is now the most serious global environmental threat, and that climate change is a direct consequence of elevated anthropogenic greenhouse gases which, reportedly, are directly linked to the continued use of fossil fuels.” [page 5]
And whom might the police rely on for that statement? No, not those pesky scientists who refuse to say what is demanded of them by oil and gas companies and the right-wing governments who love them. Instead, the RMCP quotes the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, cites a poll commissioned by a foundation connected to the oil industry, and a columnist at the Toronto Sun, a hard-right tabloid in the Murdoch mold. The Sun columnist, as quoted in the police report, said “environmental radicals” seek “to undermine the development of Canada’s oilsands — an insignificant contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions.”

Actual experts in the field would disagree. A Scientific America analysis that quotes several climate scientists reports that if all the bitumen in the Alberta tar sands were burned, 240 billion metric tons of carbon would be added to the atmosphere. The total amount of carbon that has been thrown into atmosphere by humanity in all of history is estimated at 588 billion tons.

Are going to believe the police or your lying eyes?
The Globe and Mail of Toronto quoted a Royal Canadian Mounted Police spokesman denying any intention of spying on peaceful protestors:
“There is no focus on environmental groups, but rather on the broader criminal threats to Canada’s critical infrastructure. The RCMP does not monitor any environmental protest group. Its mandate is to investigate individuals involved in criminality.”
But the newspaper’s report noted that the spokesman “would not comment on the tone” of the report, which even The Globe and Mail, a leading establishment publication, found difficult to accept as it earlier in the article noted the RMCP report’s “highly charged language.” Moreover, Canadian human rights organizations filed complaints earlier in February over spying on opponents of the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline, a project intended to move tar sands oil from Alberta to a port in northern British Columbia, passing through hundreds of miles of environmentally sensitive lands.

Environmentalists and Indigenous peoples have been subjected to spying by the RMCP and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, according to a complaint filed by the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association. The association is also opposing a new measure, the Anti-terrorism Act 2015, or Bill C-51, intended to “dramatically expand the powers of Canada’s national security agencies.” The association reports:
“Bill C-51 makes massive changes to many aspects of Canada’s spying and security system. Any one of the changes – making it easier to lock people up without charge; criminalizing expression; vastly expanding the powers of Canada’s spies; gutting privacy protections – is significant, raises constitutional questions, and must be the subject of serious debate. Lumping them all together into one bill, and proposing to speed that bill through Parliament, virtually guarantees that democratic debate on these proposed measures will be insufficient.”
Such speed is consistent with the Harper government’s attitude toward activists. A previous environment minister, Peter Kent, called parliamentary opponents of tar sands “treacherous” and had a long history of dismantling every regulation he could. The current environment minister, Leona Aglukkaq, while less inclined to frontal attacks, nonetheless also doubts climate change.

From smoking is good for you to the weather is just fine
Global-warming denialism is well-funded, with oil and gas companies often the heaviest contributors to “think tanks” that specialize in doubting scientific evidence on behalf of their corporate benefactors. An excellent roundup of these deniers, written by physics professor John W. Farley for the May 2012 edition of Monthly Review, noted that Exxon Mobil Corporation, the Koch brothers and other special interests have spent tens of millions of dollars.

One of these corporate-funded “think tanks” is the Heartland Institute, which began life as a Big Tobacco outfit issuing reports denying links between smoking and cancer.....   more here