Showing posts with label budget. Show all posts
Showing posts with label budget. Show all posts

Thursday, April 16, 2015

3 Things to Know About CarbonWA’s Revenue-Neutral Carbon Tax

Three Things to Know About CarbonWA’s Revenue-Neutral Carbon Tax

Washington’s relief pitcher is ready to put a revenue-neutral carbon tax on the 2016 ballot.


Kristin Eberhard   Sightline Institute  April 16, 2015

Washington House Democrats recently threw a ball by failing to include badly needed carbon revenue in their proposed budget. There may still be time to get carbon revenue back on the table, but a relief pitcher is warming up, just in case. In March, CarbonWA, a grassroots group, filed ballot language with the Secretary of State, and now supporters are out gathering signatures and raising money to put it on the 2016 ballot.

CarbonWA’s Initiative 732 is modeled after British Columbia’s successful carbon tax: it would tax pollution and use all the revenue to cut other state taxes. The CarbonWA tax would start at $15 per ton, rise to $25 per ton in year two, and then slowly and steadily increase by inflation plus 3.5 percent each year. The roughly $1.7 billion in annual revenue would:
  • Reduce the state sales tax from 6.5 percent to 5.5 percent.
  • Eliminate the business and occupation (B&O) tax for manufacturers.
  • Fund the Working Families Rebate to provide up to $1,500 a year for 400,000 low-income working households.


Here’s what you need to know about what CarbonWA’s proposal would mean for Washington:

 

1. Most households’ total tax bill would not change.

A $25 per ton carbon tax plus a lower sales tax would mean most Washington families would spend a few hundred dollars more in energy prices and would save a few hundred dollars on sales tax. By taxing pollution instead of commerce, Washington could spur the transition to clean energy at no cost to most Washingtonian taxpayers.
If you live in Washington and want to know what the tax swap would mean for you, you can find out from the University of Washington’s tax swap calculator.

 

2. The Working Families Rebate would make Washington’s tax code more progressive.

Washington has the most regressive state tax system in the United States: the lowest-income families pay nearly 17 percent of their income for state and local taxes, while the richest families pay only 2.4 percent. CarbonWA’s proposal would start to fix that by paying for the never-funded Working Families Rebate. This tax break would reduce the tax burden on a working family with two children from 17 percent to 6.8 percent of income and would constitute the biggest improvement in Washington tax progressivity in almost 40 years.

 

3. By making polluters pay the true costs of pollution, the carbon tax would spur Washington’s transition to clean energy.

By ending the free lunch for polluters, CarbonWA’s tax would move Washington’s economy in the right direction. British Columbia’s eight-year experience with taxing pollution indicates that a tax of $10-30 per ton can cut fuel use much more than predicted without negative economic impacts. Current prices for electricity from coal, natural gas, and renewables indicate that CarbonWA’s $25 per ton could significantly shift the electricity sector toward less-polluting sources.

A steady and predictably rising price on pollution could usher in an orderly transition to clean energy for free for most households, with the added bonus of improving Washington’s woefully regressive tax code. Win.

Friday, December 19, 2014

Waiting for Catastrophe: fossil fuels threaten public safety

 

Wash. Gov. Jay Inslee won't match Oregon's big boost for tiny Columbia River Gorge Commission

 By Rob Davis  The Oregonian  Dec. 18, 2014

The Columbia River Gorge Commission won't grow after all.

Washington Gov. Jay Inslee didn't match Oregon's proposed budget boost for the interstate agency responsible for protecting the Columbia Gorge National Scenic Area and planning growth within it. Inslee kept the commission's funding flat.

Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber's budget proposed nearly doubling Oregon's spending on the commission, adding $768,000 to allow the five-employee agency to hire four more people to plan the gorge's future -- including how to address risks like the rise in oil and coal shipments.

The gorge has become the Pacific Northwest's main route for mile-long oil trains carrying volatile North Dakota crude to West Coast refineries. As many as 19 trains a week each move more than 1 million gallons of oil along Washington's side of the Columbia River....    read more here

Coal exports: Oregon allows Wyoming, Montana to participate in Columbia River terminal appeal

Rob Davis  The Oregonian  Dec. 17, 2014

Wyoming and Montana, two major coal states, will be allowed to participate in an appeal of Oregon's permit denial for a Columbia River coal export terminal.

The permit, which Oregon's Department of State Lands rejected in August, is a key barrier for a project proposing to connect large coal deposits in Wyoming and Montana's Powder River Basin with potential buyers in South Korea and other Asian countries.....   read more here

25 homes evacuated: an unstoppable gas leak in another Ohio fracking 'incident'


Daily Kos   Dec. 18, 2014

Another day, another toxic spill thanks to fracking:
About 25 families in eastern Ohio have been unable to live in their houses for the past three days because of a natural-gas leak at a fracking well that crews cannot stop.
Bethany McCorkle, a spokeswoman for the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, the state agency that regulates oil and gas, said crews lost control of the Monroe County well on Saturday. […]
The well is not on fire, but the gas could be explosive.
Ohio has had its share of fracking accidents this year. In May, a blowout resulted in an oil spill into an Ohio river tributary. And then this happened the following month:...   read more here