Showing posts with label fishing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fishing. Show all posts

Saturday, February 13, 2016

"crude oil is bad for fish"

FISH

Fish deformities spiked after Lac-Mégantic oil spill, report says

via Hamilton Spectator
MONTREAL Scientists have recorded an "unprecedented" spike in the fish deformities in the wake of the deadly 2013 train derailment and oil spill in Lac-Mégantic, Que., according to a provincial government report.
The report into the effects of the disaster on the 185-km-long Chaudière River, which begins in Lac Mégantic, found that in some parts of the river as many as 47 per cent of the fish they collected had an external deformation.
The rate of deformations greatly surpassed that recorded in a similar fish population study in 1994. The study also found a "marked drop" in the river's fish biomass, or total weight.
"There is no hypothesis other than the oil spill of July 6, 2013 that can explain these results," says the report, which got little attention when it was released last November. It was brought to wider attention Wednesday when resurrected by Montreal's Le Devoir newspaper.

The Train Derailment That Gushed Oil Into A Quebec River
Has Spawned Freaky Fish


via Vice News
By Jake Bleiberg February 11, 2016 | 9:00 am

Two-and-a-half years after a train carrying millions of gallons of crude oil derailed and exploded in the small Quebec town of Lac-Mégantic, scientists are finding deformities in the fish living in nearby rivers.
That's led the government to a revelation: crude oil is bad for fish.

No shit.
What is shocking, however, is the extent of the problem: the rate of the deformations in one sample was found to be ten times higher than normal.---------------Normally such abnormalities are found in fewer than five percent of fish and back in 1994 their occurrence was even lower in the Chaudière, the report states. But in the year following the oil spill the river's fish showed much higher rates of deformity — with two samples reaching 35 and 47 percent. The study also noted a significant drop in river's fish biomass, or collective weight.
"In addition to being much higher than in 1994, the rate of anomalies in the Chaudière River in 2014 significantly exceeded what is generally observed in all other waterways of Quebec," the report states. "These high rates are attributable, in all likelihood, to the July 2013 oil spill."Although the spilled oil still seems to be affecting the fish, the waters of the Chaudière are largely free of it and the scope and concentration of oil in the riverbed has fallen significantly since 2013. The persistent impact on the fish didn't surprise Isabelle Picard, an aquatic biologist, who said toxins in the sediments where fish spawn are a major driver of deformities.
How would you like to have all the info and action items about Crude, Coal and other plans around the Northwest sent to you in a friendly email once a week or so? Sign Lynne Oulmans petition and find out what you can do in a timely manner.

Good Evening Petitioners (Feb. 13, 2016, 5.30 PM),
How are you all holding up?  I have not been getting a lot of feedback and thought it might be good to put this on top of the list today. Comments besides submissions are always welcome.
The actions keep coming and the work seems never ending.  I wish we could get our State to ask for a ProgrammaticCumulative Studyof all the fossil fuel projects focusing on Washington and Oregon. It seems like the obvious thing to do – a regional investigation of all the problems associated with fossil fuel and related industrial development.  Instead, we must continue this game of wack-a mole.

Once again, I hope you will dig in your toes and hold the line. Our children and theirs deserve at least this much. Thank you as always for your never-ending efforts.  I hope you have a happy and safe Valentine’s Day.
Lynne Oulman (Petition URL directly below.  Please help push the number to 10,000!)
_______________________________________
A) ACTIONS & EVENTS:
_______________________________________
1a) From Dres - Environmental Action
______________
2a) From John via Tom – WORC
“Living With Oil & Gas”
________________
3a) From PSR
“Join us in telling the nation's governors: It's time to proceed with the Clean Power Plan. …”
_________
4a) From Brandy – Climate Truth  (OMG – hard to believe..-L)
“…To see how we’re keeping climate in the election conversation,watch Miami resident and Cuban refugee Maribel Balbin confront Senator Rubio about the threat that climate change poses to their shared community. (Spoiler: he’s not interested.) …”
___________
5a) From MEIC
Contact the Montana Public Service Commission TODAY and ask them not to approve MDU’s proposed rate increase to fund 1958 vintage coal units like the Lewis and Clark Station. Instead, the PSC should encourage the utility to invest that money in new, affordable renewable energy resources. …”
_________
6a) From Alex – Forest Ethics
“…-- several of dirty energy’s best friends in the State Senate want to make it harder for you to weigh in by proposing two measures that would stifle your voice: SB 6224 & SB 6527. â€¨â€¨You have the right to be heard. Contact your State Senator and ask them to stand up for the people of Washington State and vote against these measures (this page is from our friends at Stand Up to Oil). …”
__________
7a) From Cecile – Environment WA Solar Organizer
“…State legislators are considering a bill to expand and extend the WA State Renewable Cost Recovery Incentive Program. This programas has effectively encouraged thousands of Washington State residents and businesses to invest in and install solar in their neighborhoods. 

If legislators don’t act, this program expires in 2020, and is already hitting caps that are undermining the continued growth of solar in WA.

Tell your legislators to support clean renewable energy, and to pass the renewable energy incentive bill (HB 2346). …” https://environmentwashington.webaction.org/p/dia/action3/common/public/?action_KEY=14744&utm_source=Salsa&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=WAE4-SENG:SOLAR-0216&utm_content=EM6:01A:0TH-LLP&uid=497456
________________
8a) From Lynne -  Please Join Wild Earth Guardians
__________
9a) From David - Oil Change
“…Right now, communities across Iowa are in a pitched battle against the fossil fuel industry. At stake is ANOTHER massive oil pipeline cutting across the heartland of the United States. It’s called the ‘Dakota Access’ pipeline and, if built, would further incentivize decades of Bakken shale oil development. …”
____________
10a) From Matt Petryni – RE Sources – (interesting twist…-L)
_______________________________________________________
B) IMPORTANT ARTICLES:
______________________________________
1b) From Tom:
SNL –
“UPDATE: 'End of an Era': Arch joins list of nearly 50 coal bankruptcies since 2012”
Commondreams
__________
2b) From Truthout
_____________________
3b) From Emily – EDF
___________________
4b) From Sightline Daily
______________
5b) From Waterkeeper Alliance
________________
6b) From DeSmog Canada
&
___________
7b) From Matt P – RE Sources
____________________
8b) Lynne’s Disclaimer
I am a citizen with no obligation to any particular group. I started the petition July 11, 2011, when Gregoire was Washington’s governor (hence her name is listed). All the listed recipients have received their copies. Every now and then, I print a hardcopy to share with various politicians and influential individuals. Recently I gave a hardcopy to now WA Governor Inslee.
My emails happen when information hits a critical mass, or when an action/event is imminent. Sometimes information comes to me with little time to spare. I do my best to be accurate and try to send out responsible information.  At times, events get changed, or the internet connection gets hung up, but I try to stay on top of problems. I welcome your input and hope you find this list a way to stay connected and informed. If the emails get to be burdensome, you may unsubscribe following the link at the bottom of the petition email.If your name gets dropped by accident, simply re-sign the petition. The SignOn system eliminates duplicate signatures. SignOn manages the list, so I have no power to add or subtract a name. I may not fund raise, and the system is unable to accommodate attachments, pdf-s, or pictures.

Thursday, September 17, 2015

Impacts of Crude Oil on the Grays Harbor Economy and the Quinault Nation


Friends of Grays Harbor has just released an important study on the economic impacts of crude oil transport to Grays Harbor.   
The report can be accessed by visiting http://fogh.org and click on IMPACTS OF CRUDE OIL ON GRAYS HARBOR’S ECONOMY to download the PDF.

This study confirms that the risk of bringing crude oil to the Harbor, will jeopardize Washington’s Coast and devastate the estuary and impact the livelihoods and quality of life of thousands of residents.  We hope you will comment on the Draft EIS.  Please come to one of the public hearings to be held on this project.  October 1, 2015 at the Satsop Business Park, Flextech Building, (Building 100), 150 Technology Way, Elma Washington or October 8, 2015 at the D & R Threatre 205 South I Street, Aberdeen, Washington.  Each hearing will take public testimony from 1:30pm - 4:30pm and again at 6:00pm - 9:00pm.  The doors are open from 1:00pm - 9:00pm on those two days.  You can learn more at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/geographic/graysharbor/terminals.html  

Update:  (new location) There will be a rally of citizens on October 8 on the Heron side of I Street, near the D&R Theater  in Aberdeen beginning at 5:00pm on October 8th.

Please attend and bring a few hundred of your closest friends.  Crude oil cannot be mitigated. 

Two other recent studies are discussed below:

The Impacts of a Grays Harbor Oil Spill, in 13 Slides

How Big Oil jeopardizes Washington coastal tourism and the Quinault Nation.


Tarika Powell and Eric de Place  September 17, 2015    Sightline Institute

Three large oil terminals proposed for Grays Harbor could undermine the region’s economy and local culture. That’s the takeaway from two recent economic analyses: first, a study on coastal recreation in Washington from the Surfrider Foundation and marine technology firm Point 97; then, Economic Impacts of Crude Oil Transportation on the Quinault Indian Nation and the Local Economy, published by economic consulting firm Resource Dimensions.

These reports help clarify the real threat that oil transport poses to Grays Harbor. But since most people don’t have time to thumb through such detailed findings, Sightline commissioned the following graphics to sum up the key points.

Over forty percent of Washington residents travel to the coast each year; their top recreational activities are beachgoing, scenic enjoyment, wildlife viewing, photography, and hiking/biking.

Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy. Data Source: Surfrider Foundation.
Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy. Data Source: Surfrider Foundation.

Coastal visitors spend an estimated $481 million dollars per year on recreation and tourism trips. An oil spill in the bay could do tremendous harm to businesses that are dependent on tourism dollars.


Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy. Data Source: Surfrider Foundation.
Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy. Data Source: Surfrider Foundation.

The proposed oil projects could also have a devastating impact on fishing and tourism for the Quinault Indian Nation, as they have in the past: Quinault lands were oiled during the 1988 Nestucca oil spill at the mouth of Grays Harbor.

Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy. Data Source: Resource Dimensions.
Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy. Data Source: Resource Dimensions.

An increased volume of oil going into and out of Grays Harbor would increase the risk of spills, so Resource Dimensions studied three oil spill scenarios.

Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy. Data Source: Resource Dimensions.
Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy. Data Source: Resource Dimensions.

Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy. Data Source: Resource Dimensions.
Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy. Data Source: Resource Dimensions.
      
*** continued below***

Friday, August 21, 2015

Letters to the Editor on Crude by Rail by Grays Harbor Residents

Updated: add'l letter added at end

Grays Harbor poor choice for locating crude oil terminals

BY LARRY THEVIK  Aug. 21, 2015    Special to The Olympian 

The dangers of oil trains have understandably dominated headlines about proposed oil terminals in Washington state. As a long-time crab fisherman out of Grays Harbor, I’m very concerned about another risk that has so far gotten far less attention yet deserves equal time in the public spotlight: the consequences of a major oil spill for our local economy, environment and way of life.

Grays Harbor is an essential fish habitat for many species and a major nursery area for Dungeness crab. The tribal and non-tribal average crab catch value, based on state and tribal estimates, is $44 million a year. The annual economic benefit is $80 million to $150 million, depending on the multiplier used.

In 2014 Washington residents took an estimated 4.1 million trips to the Washington Coast spending $481 million, according to a Surf Rider Foundation study. More than one-third of those visits were to Grays Harbor County to enjoy all our coastal waters have to offer.

The state is expected to soon release for public comment a draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) for the first two of three crude oil terminal proposals in Grays Harbor.

No crude oil presently moves through Grays Harbor. Yet, if the terminals are built, oil tanker and oil barge traffic is expected to increase vessel visits by 450 percent, adding 750 oil-vessel bar transits annually. The Grays Harbor shipping channel is narrow, shallow, subject to strong current flows, and has limited staging area for ships and tugs.

The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife stated, “Grays Harbor is an area particularly sensitive to the adverse effects of oil spills.” The introduction of such huge volumes of oil transport and oil vessel traffic in an area not suited to them in the first place is inviting disaster. Grays Harbor is simply a poor choice for oil terminals.

Between trains, tanks, ships and barges, up to 115 million gallons of oil will be in Grays Harbor at any one time. We know from disasters like the Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico and Exxon Valdez in Alaska that one major oil spill can be devastating: contaminating coastlines, killing fish and wildlife, destroying livelihoods and ruining property values. The damage can last for decades, even generations.

One major spill is one too many. The proposed oil terminals threaten not just Grays Harbor, but our state’s entire coast, a place cherished by millions. Those who care must engage in the DEIS comment process to tell our state leaders to put our waterways, our jobs, and our communities ahead of oil companies’ relentless pursuit of expanding markets and profits at our peril.

Larry Thevik has fished Grays Harbor and the coast for 45 years in pursuit of salmon, halibut, tuna, prawns and Dungeness crab. He is vice president of Washington Dungeness Crab Fishermen’s Association.

Margin of safety is thin




I am new to this area, so at the risk of sounding redundant, I’d like to address the problem with railroad tankers in general that are carrying crude oil every day and will be here unless we do more to stop it.
 
These antiquated DOT-111 tankers were built in the 1960s and are less than a half inch in thickness; 7/16 of an inch to be exact. There are approximately 200,000 of them out there and approximately 78,000 of them still hauling crude oil.

Safety flaws were vehemently pointed out in the early ’90s but fell upon deaf ears.
These railroad tankers are no joke. They are old, weak, poorly designed and are coming to our county unless we do something to stop it. Poorly designed vessels such as these cause people to die and communities to wither.
 
Senator Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) has compared the car to “a ticking time bomb.”
The CPC-1232 is an upgraded car but certainly not by much. It still has the same thickness as the DOT-111, so no improvement there. It was one of the 105 cars in the CSX train derailment in Lynchburg, VA., April 2014 and ultimately spilled 30,000 gallons of Bakken crude oil into the James River. That same type of tanker apparently was leaking crude oil as it came across Idaho into Washington in January of this year.
 
There is a new tanker being built in Mexico which has a thickness of 9/16th of an inch. U.S. railroad corporations are not giving any indication they will even consider spending money to upgrade. Unless forced to by Congress to scrap the DOT-111 tanker, it will live on.
 
At this point railroads are being asked to upgrade but not forced to. So there are no new and improved rail tankers coming down the pike any time soon.
 
One can safely assume that the two 7/16 inch shelled tankers I spoke of are the ones that what will be carrying the crude through Grays Harbor County if big oil is allowed here. We will be living with them and their volatility every day. I don’t want to live here having to hold my breath because it really is a case of when (a spill or explosion will happen) not if.
 
This is my reason for writing today. Please voice your opposition before it’s too late.
Remember that Big Oil doesn’t know us as a community and doesn’t want to know us. They just want what we have. And in this case, it’s our backyards.

Joan Morabito
Ocean Shores


Update: this letter was published by the Daily World on 8/18/15 but not posted on their website

Editor:


I am writing to congratulate the City of Aberdeen on adopting a six month moratorium on crude oil storage, affirming the enormous risk and little gain associated with oil storage and transport in Grays Harbor. The Port of Grays Harbor is a poor choice for shipping Canadian tar-sands crude oil or US Bakken crude oil. The proposed crude oil trains would travel through Aberdeen and the terminals would be sited within the population center of Hoquiam, creating substantial risk from fire or explosions Tank overflows on average occur every 3,300 tank fillings causing several explosions and fires.  There is also the risk of spillage, accident, and fire with any train-to-tank transfer, which could occur at any of three locations within the city of Hoquiam.  The potential for disaster is real.

The Port is built on landfill in a tsunami alert zone, whose land and waters are battered by serious storms and subject to flooding.  The pilings supporting the terminals are unlikely to withstand a tsunami resulting in nearly certain tank rupture, fire, and explosions spreading to the entire complex.

Where is the gain to the communities of Grays Harbor?  The three companies who plan to build facilities to receive, store and ship crude oil from Hoquiam would create tank farms with over a 110 million gallon capacity. Initially, there would be jobs constructing the tank farms, but once completed, those in the longshore industry predict a net loss because the current more labor intensive work of handling commodities in the Port would be replaced by the largely automated work of unloading and loading oil.  There are other important economic impacts to consider, including the effects of steadily increasing heavy, slow and over one mile long 100 car trains, each carrying approximately 2.9 million gallons of volatile crude. Such long slow trains would interrupt the flow of traffic to businesses, homes, and schools, and would interfere with emergency responses.

Fishing and tourism industry are major components of the Twin Harbor’s economy.  The risk is high for leaks during transport, and spills during loading and unloading, contaminating our waters and devastating these industries for many years.  How can we run the risk of losing our thriving seafood industry jobs for a mere handful of crude oil jobs?

The chemical fumes (vapors and gases) vented from the oil storage tanks with floating lids, as well as fumes emitted during the loading and unloading of trains and tankers will impact Hoquiam and Aberdeen and  surrounding towns affecting citizen health and  diminishing property values. Exposure to this air pollution includes increased risks of cancers, stroke and heart attack, asthma, allergies, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and neuro-developmental and behavioral disorders in children.

I wish also to welcome Renewable Energy Group, the new owners of Imperium Renewables, with the sincere hope that they will hold as a priority the long-term welfare of the persons, economy, the bay and the beautiful surroundings of Grays Harbor.

Kathy Schaefer
 

Wednesday, July 1, 2015

Coastal Washington, the Oil Industry Sacrifice Zone




This Hoquiam forum was a free community discussion on the oil industry’s plan to build three oil-by-rail terminals in Grays Harbor, focusing on how oil transport threatens the community, the waterways, the climate and residents’ livelihoods. “Coastal Washington — The Oil Industry Sacrifice Zone” was held 6:30 to 8 p.m. Wednesday, June 10, at Hoquiam High School.

The moderator was  Eric de Place of Sightline Institute. Speakers included Pastor Val Metropoulos, Amazing Grace Lutheran Church; Larry Thevik, Washington Dungeness Crab Fisherman Assoc.; David Batker, Earth Economics; Tammy Domike, Citizens for a Clean Harbor; Crystal Dingler, Ocean Shores Mayor and Fawn Sharp, President Quinault Indian Nation. 
The events was hosted by Citizens for a Clean Harbor, Climate Solutions, Earth Ministry and Washington Interfaith Power &Light, Friends of Grays Harbor, Grays Harbor Audubon, Grays Harbor Coalition for Infrastructure, Sightline Institute, WA Dungeness Crab Fisherman Assoc., and the Washington Environmental Council.


Much Thanks to Shannon & Bill of North Beach Community TV for filming our Forum. 
Please visit their Go Fund Me page,  Go Green Grays Harbor  and help them fund the October Summit they are planning.
In October 2015 North Beach Community TV will be hosting the first annual Green Jobs for Grays Harbor Summit and we need your help to fund this worthwhile event. 
Grays Harbor is an economically disadvantaged area located in Western Washington.  As an economically disadvantaged area, we are vulnerable to any endeavor that might bring the promise of jobs to our area. Many of our elected officials think that allowing Big Oil to transport highly volatile Bakken crude oil through our communities, by rail, to our port is a great idea. We, the people, don't think so. (Please watch our video)