Showing posts with label economic damage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label economic damage. Show all posts

Thursday, February 25, 2016

Oceanic Climate Change & OPEC Efficiency






Decaying algal foam on a beach (Image courtesy of Dr Richard Kirby)
Often mistaken for pollution, foam found on beaches is the decaying remains of vast colonies of phytoplankton commonly known as foam algae.

Climate stirring change beneath the waves

Environment reporter, BBC News 

Human-induced climate change is triggering changes beneath the waves that could have a long-term effect on marine food webs, a study suggests.
An assessment of phytoplankton in the North Atlantic found the microscopic organisms' pole-ward shift was faster than previously reported.
It observed that the ocean's tiny plant community was "poised for marked shift and shuffle".
The findings appear in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

"Marine phytoplankton are crucial in marine food webs and global biogeochemical cycles and they are incredibly diverse but we don't really have a sense of what all the different organisms do when you modify climate, or even through natural climate variability," explained co-author Andrew Barton, a researcher at Princeton University, working at the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory.
He told BBC News: "This study attempted to get a handle on how all these different kinds of organisms may respond to anthropogenic climate change over the coming century."

Climate change takes from the poor, gives to the rich, study finds


February 24, 2016 via phys.org

Fish and other important resources are moving toward the Earth's poles as the climate warms, and wealth is moving with them, according to a new paper by scientists at Rutgers, Princeton, Yale, and Arizona State universities. 


Climate change is forcing some species of migrating fish to shift their range toward the poles, which means big changes for people whose livelihoods depend on those fish.
"What we find is that natural resources like fish are being pushed around by climate change, and that changes who gets access to them," said Malin Pinsky, professor of ecology & evolution in the School of Environmental and Biological Sciences.
The stronger and more conservation-oriented the  management in a community, the higher the value that community places on its natural resources, whether those resources are increasing or diminishing, Pinsky reports. If wealthier communities and countries are more likely to have strong resource management, then these wealthy groups are more likely to benefit, thus exacerbating inequality.
Pinsky and his co-authors have published their findings in the journal Nature Climate Change.

Saudi Arabia's Oil Minister Suggests Canada, Others Will Have To 'Get Out' Of Oil

via Huffington Post Canada , video at link
Saudi Arabia’s oil minister has a solution for the global oil glut: Instead of cutting oil production, wait for the world’s most expensive producers to go bust.
Ali Al-Naimi didn’t specifically single out the U.S.’s shale oil fields and Canada’s oilsands as the targets of his comments at an oil industry conference in Houston, Tex., on Tuesday. But as those two are among the most expensive oil plays in the world today, the target of his comments was clear.
“Efficient markets will determine where on the cost curve the marginal barrel resides,” Al-Naimi said, as quoted at Forbes. He added later: “Inefficient producers will have to get out.”
Al-Naimi rejected the idea of an OPEC production cut, saying they won't work to boost oil prices. Cutting production would mean low-cost producers like Saudi Arabia would be subsidizing higher-cost ones.
Low-cost producers cutting their own production “only delays an inevitable reckoning," he said.

Friday, September 25, 2015

Local Voices: Standing Up To Oil

Quinault Indian Nation: Standing Up To Oil

Tyson Johnston, the Vice President of the Quinault Indian Nation, knows there's so much at risk to his community by the proposed oil terminals. The Quinault people seek their livelihoods from the natural resources, in addition to the cultural and spiritual relationship with their lands.

Don't let oil terminals threaten the Quinault Indian Nation - stand up to oil today!

Mayor of Ocean Shores: Standing Up To Oil 

Mayor Dingler of Ocean Shores opposes oil trains coming through Southwest Washington and is standing out in front to say oil does not belong in Grays Harbor County.

Don't let oil terminals ruin the beaches of Ocean Shores - stand up to oil today!

Thursday, September 17, 2015

Impacts of Crude Oil on the Grays Harbor Economy and the Quinault Nation


Friends of Grays Harbor has just released an important study on the economic impacts of crude oil transport to Grays Harbor.   
The report can be accessed by visiting http://fogh.org and click on IMPACTS OF CRUDE OIL ON GRAYS HARBOR’S ECONOMY to download the PDF.

This study confirms that the risk of bringing crude oil to the Harbor, will jeopardize Washington’s Coast and devastate the estuary and impact the livelihoods and quality of life of thousands of residents.  We hope you will comment on the Draft EIS.  Please come to one of the public hearings to be held on this project.  October 1, 2015 at the Satsop Business Park, Flextech Building, (Building 100), 150 Technology Way, Elma Washington or October 8, 2015 at the D & R Threatre 205 South I Street, Aberdeen, Washington.  Each hearing will take public testimony from 1:30pm - 4:30pm and again at 6:00pm - 9:00pm.  The doors are open from 1:00pm - 9:00pm on those two days.  You can learn more at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/geographic/graysharbor/terminals.html  

Update:  (new location) There will be a rally of citizens on October 8 on the Heron side of I Street, near the D&R Theater  in Aberdeen beginning at 5:00pm on October 8th.

Please attend and bring a few hundred of your closest friends.  Crude oil cannot be mitigated. 

Two other recent studies are discussed below:

The Impacts of a Grays Harbor Oil Spill, in 13 Slides

How Big Oil jeopardizes Washington coastal tourism and the Quinault Nation.


Tarika Powell and Eric de Place  September 17, 2015    Sightline Institute

Three large oil terminals proposed for Grays Harbor could undermine the region’s economy and local culture. That’s the takeaway from two recent economic analyses: first, a study on coastal recreation in Washington from the Surfrider Foundation and marine technology firm Point 97; then, Economic Impacts of Crude Oil Transportation on the Quinault Indian Nation and the Local Economy, published by economic consulting firm Resource Dimensions.

These reports help clarify the real threat that oil transport poses to Grays Harbor. But since most people don’t have time to thumb through such detailed findings, Sightline commissioned the following graphics to sum up the key points.

Over forty percent of Washington residents travel to the coast each year; their top recreational activities are beachgoing, scenic enjoyment, wildlife viewing, photography, and hiking/biking.

Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy. Data Source: Surfrider Foundation.
Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy. Data Source: Surfrider Foundation.

Coastal visitors spend an estimated $481 million dollars per year on recreation and tourism trips. An oil spill in the bay could do tremendous harm to businesses that are dependent on tourism dollars.


Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy. Data Source: Surfrider Foundation.
Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy. Data Source: Surfrider Foundation.

The proposed oil projects could also have a devastating impact on fishing and tourism for the Quinault Indian Nation, as they have in the past: Quinault lands were oiled during the 1988 Nestucca oil spill at the mouth of Grays Harbor.

Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy. Data Source: Resource Dimensions.
Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy. Data Source: Resource Dimensions.

An increased volume of oil going into and out of Grays Harbor would increase the risk of spills, so Resource Dimensions studied three oil spill scenarios.

Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy. Data Source: Resource Dimensions.
Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy. Data Source: Resource Dimensions.

Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy. Data Source: Resource Dimensions.
Original Sightline Institute graphic, available under our free use policy. Data Source: Resource Dimensions.
      
*** continued below***

Friday, March 20, 2015

OPINION: NY Governor DOES have authority to stop crude by rail

OPINION: NY Governor DOES have authority to stop crude by rail

Repost from The Albany Times Union

[Editor:  Has anyone researched similar legal authority in California?  Under what jurisdictional authority would Governor Brown have power to stop crude oil trains, regardless of federal preemption?  - RS]   .... and let's not forget Washington and Oregon!

 

State’s next gamble is oil trains

 
By Christopher Amato and Charlene Benton, March 19, 2015

Having won approval for legalized casino gambling in New York, Gov. Andrew Cuomo is now rolling the dice on oil trains. The string of oil train disasters over the last year and a half, including four derailments in the past month in West Virginia, Illinois and Ontario resulting in massive fires, explosions and air and water pollution, shows that transporting crude oil in unsafe rail cars poses a significant threat to New Yorkers’ lives and property and the state’s natural resources.

Indeed, the oil train report prepared at the governor’s direction by five state agencies and the scores of oil train safety violations detected by federal and state inspectors confirm the dangers of transporting oil in unsafe rail cars. Yet the governor refuses to use the state’s authority to end this hazardous practice. Instead, he claims — incorrectly — that only the federal government has the authority to protect New Yorkers from the dangers of oil trains.

The Environmental Conservation Law authorizes the commissioner of the Department of Environmental Conservation to order the immediate discontinuance of any condition or activity that he finds “presents an imminent danger to the health or welfare of the people of the state or results in or is likely to result in irreversible or irreparable damage to natural resources.”

In 1990, then-DEC Commissioner Tom Jorling ordered several companies to halt the transportation of oil and sludge in unsafe barges. In that case, a federal appeals court ruled that federal law did not prevent the commissioner from exercising his emergency authority.

In October 2014, we submitted a petition to DEC on behalf of a broad coalition of community and environmental organizations requesting that Commissioner Joe Martens use his authority to prohibit the receipt and storage of crude oil in unsafe rail cars at the Albany oil terminals operated by Global Cos. and Buckeye Partners. Recently, DEC rejected the petition in a two-page letter, claiming that only the federal government can act to protect New Yorkers.

If, as the federal appeals court has held, federal law does not prevent the DEC commissioner from ordering an emergency halt to the transport of oil and sludge in unsafe barges, why can’t the commissioner order a halt to the receipt and storage of crude oil in unsafe rail cars? Given the high stakes, isn’t this course of action at least worth trying?

The Cuomo administration has repeatedly claimed that New York is the most aggressive state in the nation taking action on the threats posed by the rail transportation of highly volatile crude oil. But a recent news story reported that dangerous oil train shipments in New York have expanded on Cuomo’s watch, while other states like Washington are blocking crude-by-rail projects or requiring a full environmental, health and safety review of such projects.

The U.S. Department of Transportation estimates that an average of 10 oil train derailments will occur each year for the next two decades, and predicts that a derailment in a populated area — such as Albany — could kill hundreds of people and result in billions of dollars in damages. It is time for the Cuomo administration to stop gambling that New York will escape the type of oil train catastrophe that has already occurred in Alabama, Virginia, North Dakota, West Virginia, Illinois, Ontario, New Brunswick, and Quebec. If the governor’s luck runs out, it may cost New Yorkers their lives.

Christopher Amato is an attorney at Earthjustice, a nonprofit environmental law firm. Charlene Benton is president of the Ezra Prentice Homes Tenants Association, which represents public housing tenants in Albany’s South End.
 
Please share!
 
 

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

The boys that crashed the economy take on Climate Change


Climate Change’s Bottom Line