Showing posts with label catastrophe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label catastrophe. Show all posts

Thursday, November 5, 2015

Grays Harbor Climate March- Nov 29th !

 

Welcome to the largest climate mobilisation in history

When:  11/29/2015 1:00 pm


Where:  Aberdeen, WA, USA  

               Zelasko Park


    Contact host 
 

What will happen at the event?

Join the Global Climate March to protect our children's future, our community, the salmon, the ocean, the forests and more.  Let's talk about how we want to participate in this global event, here in Grays Harbor.  Tentative time and location 1:00 pm at Zelasko Park in Aberdeen.  We can keep it simple, walking with signs in the vicinity of the park, and posting pictures on Facebook, or we may want to do more.  Let me know if you have suggestions.  -- Donna
 
This event is part of the Global Climate March. On November 30th, world leaders meet in Paris to start negotiating the next global climate deal. That’s why, the day before, people around the world will take to the streets and push leaders at every level of government to commit to 100% clean energy. Together, we can push the world towards a climate deal that gets us off dirty energy and unleashes clean energy for all. Let's make history -- RSVP below for this Global Climate March event!

 Sign up here  



Wednesday, July 29, 2015

Oil train insurance minimums in question

Lac-Mégantic Quebec Oil Train Disaster 

Photo by REUTERS Wagons of the oil freight train that derailed and crashed in Lac Megantic, Quebec are seen on July 9, 2013

Oil train insurance minimums in question

Saturday, July 25, 2015

Letter to Warren Buffett: Put Public Safety Before Profit!

Oil train derails under Seattle's Magnolia Bridge
Oil train derailed under Seattle's Magnolia bridge- July, 2014

An Open Letter to Warren Buffett: Put Public Safety Before Profit and Prioritize Oil Train Regulation


Mike O'Brien,  Seattle City Councilmember     HuffPost    July 22, 2015

Dear Mr. Buffett,

One year ago this week, an oil train passing through Seattle ran off the tracks underneath the Magnolia Bridge, derailing three of its 100 tank cars carrying Bakken crude oil from North Dakota. Considering that unrefined Bakken crude is highly volatile, we count ourselves lucky to have avoided the catastrophic impacts these tank cars could have brought upon this city.

Today I write to you inviting an action that supports the best interest of Seattle and furthers your legacy as a leader of integrity for your generation. As local and federal policymakers grapple with the increasing risks oil trains pose to our communities, you are faced with a watershed moment. You can use your influence as the largest shareholder of Berkshire Hathaway, which owns not only Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad (BNSF), but also Union Tank Car, to minimize the risk to life, property, and the environment from oil trains.

An oil spill in Seattle so close to Puget Sound could take millions of dollars to clean up and a generation to recover. Or worse, an explosion in Seattle could result in an untold loss of human life and property damage if it were to occur downtown along the railroad tracks that run a stone's throw away from the stadiums where the Mariners and Seahawks play. Frighteningly, these scenarios are well within the realm of possibility, as we have already seen five fiery oil train derailments in North America this year. Something must be done to protect Seattle and countless other cities across the country that bear the risk that your deadly oil trains pose.

I've done everything I know how to do as a citizen, an activist, and as a City Councilmember to try and stop an inevitable disaster from happening. But cities are severely limited in our ability to impose regulatory measures on oil trains. The federal government has primary jurisdiction to regulate railroad use and therefore has the most authority to mitigate the potential for tragic consequences associated with oil train accidents.

Burlington Northern Santa Fe and railroad industry representatives have used their influence to routinely oppose federal and state safety regulations such as speed limits, public information disclosure, liability coverage for catastrophic incidents, minimum staffing requirements on trains, and electronically controlled pneumatic braking systems. And as a result of industry pressure, Model DOT-111 tank cars full of crude oil will still be allowed on rail lines passing through Seattle for at least two more years, despite the fact that they have a "high incidence of failure during accidents" and "can almost always be expected to breach in derailments that involved multiple car-to-car impacts," according to a 2012 Railroad Accident Report from the National Transportation Safety Board.

This industry opposition poses disastrous consequences for which railroad companies are not prepared. The Bakken crude-filled oil train that derailed and exploded in Lac-Mégantic, Quebec vaporized 47 people instantly. In addition to the terrible loss of life, liabilities totaled upwards of $2 billion and forced the railroad company into bankruptcy. Yet, as the Wall Street Journal reports, there is not enough commercial insurance coverage in the world to adequately cover the costs that would be associated with a worst-case oil train derailment in a major city like Seattle. 

Lac Megantic after oil train explosion, July 2013
Oil trains are ticking time bombs on rails, and each one passing through a small town in North Dakota or a large city like Seattle is a risk to the people and the environment of that community. We urgently need stronger federal protections against these dangerous oil trains rolling through our communities. So I urge you to use your immense influence in Washington, DC and around the country to call for the immediate passage of the Crude-by-Rail Safety Act.

This Act, sponsored by Senators Maria Cantwell (WA-D), Tammy Baldwin (WI-D), Diane Feinstein (CA-D) and Patty Murray (WA-D), would strengthen notification and disclosure requirements regarding oil by rail shipments, require refinement of volatile Bakken crude prior to transport, improve oil tank car safety, and establish comprehensive emergency response plans in the event of large oil train accidents. These regulations will provide far greater assurances than those given by BNSF or Berkshire Hathaway thus far.

On the one-year anniversary of Seattle's own oil train accident, I implore to you join me in calling for public safety over profit. I ask that Berkshire Hathaway and BNSF take full responsibility for the risks they impose on Seattle and other cities across the country. I call on you to use the full force of your influence to support the federal regulations necessary for the oil and rail industries to bear the costs and risks of safe oil production and transport. Doing nothing -- or worse, continuing opposition to new safety regulations -- puts the lives of the millions of people living and working along these railways in danger, jeopardizes your legacy, and could leave you with blood (and oil) on your hands.
Please join with Seattle and cities around the country in calling for the safe, responsible transport of oil by rail, and help us get out of this unjust situation where you make all the profit while we bear all the risk.

Sincerely,
Mike O'Brien
Seattle City Councilmember

Saturday, March 28, 2015

Rail wants only private talks with WA fire chiefs; API in full spin mode

In this image made available by the City of Lynchburg, several CSX tanker cars carrying crude oil in flames after derailing in downtown Lynchburg, Va., Wednesday, April 30, 2014. (AP Photo/City of Lynchburg, LuAnn Hunt)

Several CSX tanker cars carrying crude oil in flames after derailing in downtown Lynchburg, Va.

Railroad wants to talk in private to fire chiefs about oil cars

|
The BNSF Railroad has pumped cold water on Washington Fire Chiefs request that it hand over worst-case scenarios and comprehensive emergency response plans for dealing with an oil train accident.

The railroad has offered a private talk and an “overview” of its plans.

The Washington Fire Chiefs have sent similar letters to the Union Pacific Railroad and to Canadian National and Canadian Pacific.

An average of three long oil trains pass each day through Seattle and waterfronts of other Puget Sound population centers, en route to northern Puget Sound refineries.

Taking note of the lethal 2013 disaster in Lac-Megantic, Quebec, an accident and fire in Lynchburg, Va., and the recent fiery derailment of an oil train near the Kanawaha River in West Virginia, the Washington Fire Chiefs voiced concern about response.

“All of these incidents could have been even more catastrophic should they have occurred in major population centers,” they wrote BNSF......

But the railroad is not forking over any documents.

“We would like to meet with you to discuss the items requested in your letter.  We will also provide an overview of BNSF’s emergency response plans and capabilities, and initiatives underway for derailment prevention,” wrote John Lovenburg, BNSF’s environmental vice president.....

....Emergency responders have done a slow burn over railroads’ reluctance to disclose basic information about cargoes and schedules.

In its letters to BNSF, and other railroads, Washington Fire Chiefs put the matter bluntly:
“Normally, we would be able to assess the hazard through right-to-know and other public documents; however, your industry has sought and gained exemptions to these sunshine laws.

“This exemption does not mean your industry is exempt from taking reasonable steps to ensure catastrophic accidents do not occur.”.....      more here
 
 
Meanwhile, Big Oil/Rail spin-masters are hard at work minimizing our risk and their liability:

Facts, Science Must Guide Rail Safety Improvements

March 27, 2015 
Energy Tomorrow is brought to you by the American Petroleum Institute (API),  the national trade association [ LOBBYING GROUP] that represents  America’s oil and natural gas industry.
 

Tuesday, March 3, 2015

Vancouver extends moratorium, Rail CEO fears terrorism, Sen. Cantwell plans CBR safety bill

Vancouver extends moratorium on crude oil facilities

By Amy M.E. Fischer, Columbian City government reporter    The Columbian      03/02/15

The Vancouver City Council on Monday unanimously voted to extend a moratorium on expanding or establishing crude oil-handling facilities, prompting the audience to break into applause.

Moments earlier, roughly a dozen people took the microphone to praise the council's stance against oil terminals in Vancouver and voice support for continuation of the six-month moratorium adopted Sept. 11. No one spoke against the extension.

"Corporations do not care about you or me or our families or communities. But you do care. I trust YOU," Den Mark Wichar, a Hough neighborhood resident, told the council, referring to the companies interested in establishing crude oil facilities locally.

"Thanks for having our backs," said Cathryn Chudy of Vancouver.

The original moratorium was due to expire March 10. By continuing the moratorium for six months, city staff will have time to prepare a comprehensive review of current and potential new regulations to city code. Among other things, the staff's work will involve determining which agencies have authority over crude oil, identifying interested parties and their issues, and researching actions other municipalities have taken, according to city documents.

The moratorium doesn't affect the massive oil transfer terminal proposed by Tesoro Corp. and Savage Companies that's currently under review by the state. It would be the largest such terminal in the United States when operational, receiving an average of 360,000 barrels of crude oil per day by rail at the Port of Vancouver. The state Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council will make a recommendation to Gov. Jay Inslee regarding the Tesoro project, which the Vancouver City Council formally opposes.....    more here

CP CEO fears terrorism more than derailments

Hunter Harrison says attack ‘can be planned to do the worst possible damage.’

When it comes to shipping crude oil by rail, CP Rail CEO Hunter Harrison says he worries more about a possible terrorist attack than derailments.

“That’s what concerns me more,” he told reporters after a speech at the Canadian Club on Monday. “It can be planned to do the worst possible damage.”

Harrison, who took over CP in June 2012 after a bitter proxy fight, boasted that the company has made “quantum leaps” to reduce accidents based on severity and frequency.

However, he said he cannot promise there won’t be more accidents. 

But he says he actually worries more about third parties doing damage to a hazardous goods tank, or tampering with the railroads or rights of way.

“Everybody wants the products, but nobody wants the railroad by them or their backyard,” he said during his speech, citing logjams around Chicago, where railways pass busy areas such as the McCormick Place convention centre and Soldier Field, home of the National Football League’s Chicago Bears.

“There’s huge exposure to potential accidents and we’re not addressing it like we should,” Harrison said, adding that routing protocols should be introduced to ensure the least exposure.....    more here

Cantwell to Introduce Bill on Safety Standards for Crude-by-Rail

Senator: USDOT rules don’t go far enough to protect cities and towns

kirotv.com   03/03/15
WASHINGTON, D.C. – In a Senate Commerce Committee hearing today, U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA) announced plans to introduce legislation that would establish new, stronger safety standards for trains hauling flammable crude oil.

Cantwell told U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx that she didn’t think the Administration’s proposed rule under consideration would be strong enough and that legislation would be necessary to protect communities.....  more here 

Monday, February 23, 2015

Oil-by-rail shipments are playing Russian roulette- and other links



Oil-train records public, Texas attorney general says -    Oil-train records held by the Texas Department of Public Safety are not exempt from state open records law, the state attorney general ruled last week, and must be released in full to news organizations.



  BISMARCK, N.D. — The derailment in West Virginia of a train carrying oil from North Dakota is prompting complaints that state and federal governments aren't doing enough to ensure the safe transport of crude by rail.

Sunday, February 22, 2015

Trains hauling crude projected to derail 10 times a year

Feb. 17, 2015 file photo, shows a train derailment that sent a tanker with crude oil into the Kanawha River near Mount Carbon, W.Va.

Trains hauling crude projected to derail 10 times a year

Feb. 22, 2015   Herald-Dispatch
 
BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) — The federal government predicts that trains hauling crude oil or ethanol will derail an average of 10 times a year over the next two decades, causing more than $4 billion in damage and possibly killing hundreds of people if an accident happens in a densely populated part of the U.S.

The projection comes from a previously unreported analysis by the Department of Transportation that reviewed the risks of moving vast quantities of both fuels across the nation and through major cities. The study completed last July took on new relevance this week after a train loaded with crude derailed in West Virginia, sparked a spectacular fire and forced the evacuation of hundreds of families.

Monday's accident was the latest in a spate of fiery derailments, and senior federal officials said it drives home the need for stronger tank cars, more effective braking systems and other safety improvements.

"This underscores why we need to move as quickly as possible getting these regulations in place," said Tim Butters, acting administrator for the Transportation Department's Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.

The volume of flammable liquids transported by rail has risen dramatically over the last decade, driven mostly by the oil shale boom in North Dakota and Montana. This year, rails are expected to move nearly 900,000 car loads of oil and ethanol in tankers. Each can hold 30,000 gallons of fuel.

Based on past accident trends, anticipated shipping volumes and known ethanol and crude rail routes, the analysis predicted about 15 derailments in 2015, declining to about five a year by 2034.

The 207 total derailments over the two-decade period would cause $4.5 billion in damage, according to the analysis, which predicts 10 "higher consequence events" causing more extensive damage and potential fatalities....   more here

Links:



Petroleum found in some fish near oil spill into Yellowstone - Fire Engineering

 

Oil trains quietly rerouted after W.Va. derailment

 

Waiting on new rules: After derailment, DRC says oil conditioning standards fall short-
BISMARCK — The derailment and subsequent explosion of rail cars carrying North Dakota crude oil last week has again sparked debate...