Showing posts with label wetlands. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wetlands. Show all posts

Saturday, July 11, 2015

Billions Needed to Restore Wetlands Polluted by Oil Industry in NJ

Bayway Refinery
An aerial photograph shows the Bayway oil refinery complex in Linden, New Jersey.

Exxon New Jersey Settlement Under Fire Again As Environmentalists Seek To Join Lawsuit


By    International Business Times    July 10, 2015

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s administration wants Exxon Mobil Corp. to fork over $225 million for a pair of oil refineries that dumped toxic chemicals into New Jersey's soil and water for decades. But the sum is a drop in the bucket compared with the billions of dollars needed to remove pollution and restore nearby wetlands, environmental groups say.

The organizations this week are seeking to intervene in the case between the U.S. oil giant and the state of New Jersey. The Natural Resources Defense Council, which is leading the effort, will ask a state judge Friday to make the organization a party to the litigation. The move would allow NRDC to argue in court for a higher settlement.,,,,

.... At the center of the saga are two massive oil refinery sites: the Bayway refinery in Linden, and another in the town of Bayonne. The facilities, both more than a century old, leaked millions of gallons of oil and 600 different contaminants into the soil during the time Exxon owned the plants, a state judge determined. The pollution covers or is buried under about 1,800 acres of wetlands, forests, meadows and waterways.

Nearly 1 million New Jersey residents live near the refineries in mostly blue-collar neighborhoods. The area used to be a popular spot for fishing, hunting and kayaking, but much of the land and water near the plants is now unusable. Plastic booms still float at the mouths of some creeks to capture the oil and chemicals that continue seeping into the water.....   more here


Canadian gov’t adds new charges against unionist in 2013 rail disaster


BY JOHN STEELE   The Militant  July 20, 2015


MONTREAL — Almost two years after the Lac-Mégantic, Quebec, rail disaster, which killed 47 people and destroyed the downtown core of the community of 5,000, the federal government agency Transport Canada has filed criminal charges against locomotive engineer Tom Harding for allegedly violating the Railway Safety Act and the Fisheries Act. Charges were also filed against five officials of the now-bankrupt Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railway, including CEO Robert Grindrod, as well as against the company itself. 


The July 6, 2013, train derailment and explosion put a spotlight on how the rail bosses put profits ahead of safety, especially the company’s insistence on operating with a one-person “crew,” with government agreement.

Harding is already due in court Sept. 8 to set the date for his trial on frame-up charges of 47 counts of criminal negligence causing death levied by Quebec’s crown prosecutor. Those charges could result in life imprisonment. The new charges could bring a $50,000 fine and six months in prison.

Harding is a member of the United Steelworkers union. Train controller and USW member Richard Labrie faces the same charges in Quebec, as does manager of train operations Jean Demaitre. The USW in Quebec has been raising funds to defend the two union members.

Transport Canada says the accused failed to ensure that the train’s hand brakes were properly set. The hand brakes were one of 18 factors that the report of the federal Transportation Safety Board said contributed to the disaster. Others included a “weak safety culture” on the railroad.

The company’s former owner, Edward Burkhardt, has not been charged.

The fact the federal government as a cost-cutting measure allowed the rail company to operate the 72-car crude oil train without a two-person crew was considered but not included as a “factor” in the final published report.

As he had done for years, in keeping with company regulations, Harding parked the train on a grade about seven miles from Lac-Mégantic with the engine running and the air brakes on. He set hand brakes on seven tanker cars and took a cab to a hotel to sleep.

During the night firemen were called to put out a small fire on the lead locomotive. When Harding asked his dispatcher if he should come because of the fire, he was told to go back to sleep because everything was OK. However, when the firemen shut down the engine they unknowingly turned off the air brake system. With no one on board, the train rolled down the grade, picking up speed, and derailed and exploded in downtown Lac-Mégantic.

In addition to the horrendous loss of life and destruction of 40 buildings, the explosion and fire released 1.5 million gallons of crude oil into the lake and contaminated 560,000 tons of soil. The charges under the Fisheries Act stem from the oil spill.

The explosion woke Harding, who rushed to the site, risking his life to help depressurize brakes on some of the cars that had not caught fire so they could be moved. For this reason, many in Lac-Mégantic consider him a hero.

Harding’s lawyer, Thomas Walsh, questioned the timing of the new charges against the engineer, criticizing the federal government for trying to look proactive after years of allowing unsafe railway practices like understaffing. “Now they’re coming out as if they’re taking care of business … by two years later accusing him [Harding] of something he’s already been accused of,” Walsh told the Globe and Mail. “What the hell is the point?”

“I agree there should be justice,” businessman Raymond Lafontaine, who lost his son, two stepdaughters and an employee in the disaster, told the press. But “it feels like we’re still looking for people to blame.” There are people higher up in the company that need to be held accountable, he said. 

Meanwhile, Canadian Pacific Railway, which hauled the oil from North Dakota to Montreal before handing it over to Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railway, is refusing to contribute to a $430 million settlement fund for victims’ families. The Calgary-based company argued in a Quebec court recently that it wasn’t involved. If Canadian Pacific is successful, compensation could be delayed for years.

The Steelworkers and fellow rail workers in Canada and the U.S. are raising defense funds for Harding and Labrie. To contribute in Canada, send checks to Syndicat des Métallos, 565 boulevard Crémazie Est, bureau 5100, Montreal, Quebec H2M 2V8, or go online to www.justice4USWrailworkers.org.

In the United States, checks can be sent to Tom Harding Defense Fund, First Niagara Bank, 25 McClellan Dr., Nassau, NY 12123 or visit www.tomhardingdefensefund.com.

Friday, February 13, 2015

(Not) Singing Industry’s Tune: people push back at dangerous tank cars, terminals and community impacts

Singing Industry’s Tune: How Rep. Jeff Denham Plans to Delay Oil-by-Rail Safety Improvements

DeSmogBlog   Justin Mikulka   2/13/15

I just want to make sure that we are all singing the same tune that we have a very safe industry and we want to work together on improving that industry.”

Those were the words of Rep. Jeff Denham (R-CA), chairman of the House Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials on February 3rd at a hearing titled “How the Changing Energy Markets Will Affect U.S. Transportation.” He was directing this advice to Greg Saxton, chief engineer for rail tank car manufacturer Greenbrier.

Denham obviously had a bone to pick with Saxton because prior to the hearing the Modesto Bee, a newspaper in Denham’s home district, ran an editorial making a strong case that the existing tank cars used to transport crude oil are unsafe. The editorial, Delays on safer rail cars are unacceptable,” didn’t mince words. It was clear on what should happen: “The DOT [Department of Transportation] should adopt rules for those cars then set deadlines to replace every single tank car in America. Our elected representatives should insist on it.”

In Modesto, the elected representative who should be insisting on that is Jeff Denham.

Modesto is also home to Greenbrier’s manufacturing facilities and the editorial quoted Saxton for its conclusion noting his position on the lack of new regulations. “We just need a decision. Twenty years is too long.”

This is not the tune that Chairman Denham wants everyone to be singing. In his comments to Saxton at the hearing he explained his intent.

“I’m making sure that the wrong people are not talking to the Ed boards across the country that would give a wrong perception of our current situation.”

Apparently Saxton is one of the “wrong people” to talk to editorial boards because of his insistence on adhering to the facts.....    more here 

Urge Port of Longview to Vote NO on Haven Propane Terminal on Columbia River

[Background here: Port of Longview, Haven Energy delay announcement of lease terms]

The Port of Longview Commissioners are anticipated to vote Tuesday, March 10, 9:30 am, Cowlitz County Expo Center, 430 Washington St., Longview, on a lease agreement with Haven Energy to build a propane export terminal at the Port of Longview  on the Columbia River. Comments will be taken. We hope commissioners will be convinced this project imperils the lives and livelihoods of residents of our community, and all the communities along the propane rail transport route and river export route, and vote NO on the lease with Haven.

This terminal would be the first of its kind on the U.S. Pacific coast, consisting of two 100 foot tall concrete tanks, double-hulled to thwart terrorists not for containment, with a total 900,000 barrels of storage, under constant refrigeration –44 F for propane, 30 F for butane. Delivery will be two 100 car unit trains, DOT 112, every 3 days, product under pressurization, from the N. Dakota Bakken oil fields, usual route through Washington and down the Columbia River Gorge, through Vancouver. Panamax sized carriers, about 3 ships per month, would transport down 66 miles of the Columbia River and across the notorious Columbia River bar for export to Asia, Pacific Coast, Hawaii, wherever. Coast Guard could enforce safety/exclusion zones around the vessels.

On Thursday, February 19 a special Port Commissioner meeting will be held 5:30-7:30 pm at the Cowlitz County Expo Center where Haven Energy will present a powerpoint overview of the project. Commission will accept public comment following the presentation.

Comments/letters to the Port of Longview can be sent as follows:

Make a difference by coming to speak on February 19th or March 10th, and you can also:
1.  Fill out a comment card and leave at a port meeting or mail to the Port
2.  Call the Port and leave a voice mail comment:  360-703-0231
3.  Send an email:  to the Port's general email account:  info@portoflongview.com
4.  Comments will be accepted via the Port’s website www.portoflongview.com. Click the link on the home page to be directed to the project overview and comment form.
“Comments submitted by February 20th will be compiled and forwarded to the Port Commission for consideration prior to the vote on the Haven Energy proposal scheduled for March 10th.”

General contact information:
Physical address:10 Port Way
Longview, WA 98632
Mailing address:P.O.1258
Longview, WA 98632
Bob Bagaason, Commissioner Board President
bob.bagaason@portoflongview.com
Darold Dietz, Commissioner
darold.dietz@portoflongview.com
Lou Johnson, Commissioner
lou.johnson@portoflongview.com
Geir-Eilif Kalhagen, Chief Executive Officer

Thank you,
clip_image002Landowners and Citizens for a Safe Community (LCSC)
P.O. Box 2484, Longview, WA  98632
“Our mission is to strengthen the environmental, social, and economic health of our community.”


Links:

Washougal leaders join together in opposing oil terminal -City council, school board adopt resolutions citing grave concerns

Environmentalists oppose DNR's approval of crude oil rail line through La Crosse wetlands  Citizens have raised concerns about secondary and indirect effects of the proposed rail expansion that the DNR should have considered, including the potential for flooding, hazardous spills or train derailments, increased rail noise and vibrations and impacts to local residents’ quality of life, tax revenues, recreation, property values, impacts to water and air quality, endangered and threatened species and more.  However, the DNR said the agency was not required to consider these concerns as a part of the wetland’s fill permitting process....