Showing posts with label local protest. Show all posts
Showing posts with label local protest. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 25, 2015

No New Fossil Fuel Infrastructure! sign on letter: West Coast Cities People’s Declaration

Kayaktivist with paddles up in front of the Fennica at dry dock in Portland, Oregon
Dear friends and allies,

On Nov. 12, 2015, Portland, OR, became the first city in the country (and possibly, the world--we're not sure) to pass a resolution opposing all new fossil fuel infrastructure in the city and its adjacent waterways. We in Portland will be spending the remaining 14 months while our mayor is in office making this resolution binding law-- a process we hope will show other cities how to do the same.

On Dec. 11-12, 2015, the mayors of all of the major west coast cities are coming to Portland, OR, to discuss (among other things) climate action by these cities. We are calling on all of these mayors of the major west coast cities who will be coming to Portland (San Diego, LA, San Jose, Oakland, San Francisco, Eugene, Tacoma, Seattle, Vancouver, B.C. and Honolulu), along with the mayors of smaller cities, and leaders of the Native American and First Nations tribes to oppose all new fossil fuel infrastructure.

We could use your help in the following ways.
1) Review the statement below or here:  and sign on, as an individual or organization.  Bill McKibben, Winona LaDuke, and Tom Goldtooth have been among our first signatories.
2) Share the statement far and wide, especially with friends and allies in west coast cities with the following groups of people in particular:

-- Labor unions

-- Government officials at all levels in all west coast cities
-- Any affiliated groups up and down the west coast of the US and Canada
-- Rising Tide or other groups to help us prepare a brilliant strategic actions in all of the cities and/or in Portland when the mayors come to town on Dec. 11-12.
--Outreach to the climate scientific community to get them on board
--Letters to the editor in small papers up and down the west coats, supporting this call
--Outreach to college campuses in west coast cities to get them on board.

3) If you have any spare funds, we are doing all of this on a shoestring budget, and could use donations! Donations link here
Thank you!
--Daphne Wysham
Sustainable Energy & Economy Network
Center for Sustainable Economy
Climate Action Coalition


West Coast Cities People’ Declaration: NO New Fossil Fuel Infrastructure, Just Transition Now

December 2015


We the undersigned organizations and their members in the states on the West Coast of the United States and the province of British Columbia in Canada call on leaders of the First Nations peoples of Canada and Native Americans of the U.S., Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada, President Barack Obama of the United States, the premier of British Columbia, governors of U.S. states, city mayors, and other elected officials, and regulatory agencies to stand up for climate solutions by putting an end to the construction of new fossil fuel infrastructure in our cities, our coastal ports, and communities and beginning the just transition to the new clean economy now. 

The scientific community, President Obama and other political and religious leaders have told us very clearly that we have arrived at a critical moment in human history when we either act now or we doom present and future generations to an escalating planetary crisis of catastrophic climate change. They tell us we must leave 80 percent of proven fossil fuel reserves in the ground, and leave all unproven reserves untouched.[1] Despite the growing scientific alarm, too many of our elected officials are continuing with business as usual, condoning the expansion of this deadly fossil fuel industry and exacerbating a crisis that the Pentagon has called a “threat multiplier” that could exacerbate terrorism.[2]

Our communities are assaulted every day with ever-increasing volumes of explosive oil and gas cargo close to our homes, our schools and our places of worship; with coal dust clouding our air as mile-long trains cut through our towns; with unaccountable corporations pushing oil and gas pipelines across our land; and with toxic emissions increasing rates of asthma among our children and threatening our elderly when this fossil fuel is burned. The fossil fuel export terminals and pipelines often traverse geologically active areas and earthquake subduction zones, exposing nearby communities to the risk of calamitous explosions and toxic spills should a major quake take place. At the point of extraction, and at every step of the way to our port cities, too often Native American and First Nations treaty rights are being violated in order to facilitate the extraction, transport, storage and export of this dangerous cargo. Too often, it is the poorest that bear the brunt of this pollution. Our water is threatened by regular spills of oil and tar sands, and by toxic mercury emitted when these fossil fuels are burned. Our fish are dying in rivers overheated by rising temperatures caused by the burning of fossil fuels. And our forests, once a place of refuge for wildlife in the heat, are increasingly going up in flames or succumbing to pests due to increasing temperatures. The oceans are becoming too acidic to support critical links in the food chain. 

This destruction is as unnecessary as it is unconscionable. Solutions are available now. There are no insurmountable economic or technological obstacles to a clean energy transition. Our cities are demonstrating the promise of this transition every day, building healthier communities, better buildings, and more efficient and affordable transportation systems while lowering emissions. We are taking our money and power back and investing them in our communities. We can do this. But there’s a reason that we are not doing it fast enough now, a reason that we continue to make the problem worse even as we prove the promise of solutions: the entrenched power of the fossil fuel industry, and their unconscionable campaign of deception that protects that power.

We now know that the fossil fuel industry has been covering up the devastating truth about climate change for almost four decades. Recent reports[3] reveal that Exxon knew as early as the 1970s that climate change would threaten all of us, yet chose to confuse and mislead the public, putting its profits ahead of the planet. The delays caused by these actions by the fossil fuel industry leave us with no time to lose. We must act immediately and decisively. Implementing solutions will take time, but we must stop investing in the problem right away.

New fossil fuel infrastructure locks us into a deadly climate future, making the problem not just worse but insoluble. The transition from present emission levels to safe levels will take decades, but it begins with a simple and firm commitment today: we must stop making it worse with large new capital investments that increase emissions. We don’t have time or money to waste going backwards.[4]

In order to begin to act on climate change, we support and align your jurisdiction’s policy to these two vital commitments: 


1) We must stop building new fossil fuel infrastructure in order to leave at least 80% of proven fossil fuel reserves in the ground;

2) We must invest in a “just transition”[5] to a clean economy – a transition that delivers shared prosperity, good, family-supporting jobs, and support for people and communities who bear the brunt of climate impacts and economic dislocation.


It is imperative that the West Coast of the United States does our share to meet these two commitments.

Signed,
your name!      Sign on here



Sunday, July 12, 2015

Letters to the Editor


This weekend, the Daily World published two important letters. Please write your own LTE and submit. Wouldn't it be great to see an anti-oil letter in each paper they publish?

Not too late to block oil projects
Hoquiam Mayor Jack Durney is either uninformed or is simply engaging in jiggery pokery. In the July 7 Daily World article highlighting his candidacy for mayor of Hoquiam, he says in reference to the crude oil terminals, “Once somebody applies for a permit, they’re in. As far as going through the process, you can’t block it.”

This is completely incorrect and nonsense. The original permits have, in fact, been blocked and the current permit application could also be blocked. And if the majority of the public has anything to say about it, they will be!

If Mayor Durney is being misled by advice from his City Administrator Brian Shay, that presents another problem, as Brian Shay is the final “decider.” If Mr. Shay has made up his mind to approve, before having all the facts and no matter how heinous the impacts might be, then he is doing a great disservice to the people of Grays Harbor and will be held responsible for that. The Washington Department of Ecology is spending countless hours working with the proponents’ consultants developing the Environmental Impact Statement. The public has made its voice heard through their elected representatives that they do not want crude oil to be transported or stored on Grays Harbor.

Why are we going through the environmental impact review if the permits can’t be blocked? Why bother with public hearings?

The City of Hoquiam holds the fate of the future of Grays Harbor in its hands. It has the power to say no. We all need to make sure they do the right thing.

Linda Orgel, Aberdeen

No to oil
July 6 marked the second anniversary of an event which everyone in Grays Harbor should be aware. On July 6, 2013, a parked train carrying Bakken crude oil rolled down a hill, derailed and caught fire in downtown Lac-Mégantic, Quebec. The chain of fires triggered by the derailment devastated the town.
Forty-seven people were killed. Nearly half of the downtown buildings were destroyed; the other half had to be demolished due to toxic oil contamination.
The tragedy at Lac-Mégantic is a reminder of the devastation that a derailment of oil trains traveling through Aberdeen and Hoquiam could bring.
Having a clinic just feet from the railroad tracks makes me concerned for the safety of my patients and staff, should there be a derailment, as well as any other businesses or residences close to the tracks.
Add to the trains the compounding danger of the storage facilities at our port, which if built would put many of our community’s people and community resources in grave danger.
There are three proposed oil terminals in Grays Harbor. Together they would bring over 150,000 barrels of oil daily through our communities. That’s three loaded oil trains a day. That’s a risk that we’re not willing to take.
We are especially concerned about the human health and safety issues at stake if the three proposed oil terminal facilities are constructed on Grays Harbor. Whether triggered by equipment failure, human error or an earthquake and subsequent tsunami, huge risks of fire exist at rail terminal facilities that would store hundreds of thousands of barrels of volatile crude oil from the Bakken region in North Dakota and Montana.
Assuming the oil makes it safely through our community by train, it still must travel over our water. Again this is more than 150,000 barrels of oil a day. One accident could mean an oil spill to rival the Exxon Valdez disaster in Alaska.
We know too many people whose livelihoods are dependent on our water for this to make sense.
Physicians have traditionally employed the Prevention Principle in cases where dangers are known to exist. What we cannot cure — and surely, we cannot cure the deaths and severe burn injuries that could result from a major derailment or terminal fire — we must prevent. Lac-Mégantic and numerous other accidents have shown us that derailments, oil spills and explosions at petroleum handling facilities are known to occur.
Let us honor the victims of Lac-Mégantic by vowing to protect our own families and neighbors and speaking up to oppose crude oil handling facilities on Grays Harbor.
Over 300 health care professionals from all along the rail line, including Grays Harbor, have signed a letter opposing these proposed crude by rail terminals. And we are in good company with many leaders around the region, including elected officials, faith leaders, First Nations, fishermen and women, business leaders and concerned parents and grandparents.
We expect the hearings about these proposed crude by rail terminals to happen in the next month. To find out more and get involved, go to standuptooil.org.
Dr. Susan Ruyle and Angelique Rosche
Aberdeen
- See more at: http://thedailyworld.com/opinion/letters/no-oil#sthash.LPEBWPVI.dpuf

Thursday, June 25, 2015

Dr. StrangeWeather, or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love The Bomb-Train

Dr. StrangeWeather, or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love The Bomb-Train

by Stephyn Quirke     6/24/15      Earth First! Newswire

Is our weather getting funny?

Some bushes and flowers started to bloom near the end of January this year, and in the spring cherry blossoms were blooming weeks early. This capped a winter with extremely low snowfall in the Cascade Mountains. The abnormal heat, combined with the drought now covering 80% of Oregon, has actually raised temperatures in the Willamette River above 70 degrees, recently killing chinook salmon as they made their way up-stream to spawn.

In March, tribal leaders from the Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians converged in Portland to discuss this ongoing phenomenon of strange weather, which they cannily dubbed “climate change”. These changes, they said, were related to a pattern of global warming, and were creating unique hardship on Northwest tribes. In 2013, the ATNI also passed a resolution opposing all new fossil fuel proposals in the Northwest, citing harm to their treat rights, cultural resources, and land they hold sacred. Now the Affiliated Tribes are discussing plans for adaptation and mitigation, and asking how to undermine the root causes of climate change.

In addition to the sudden onset of strange weather, Portland has also seen the abrupt arrival of strange, mile-long trains loaded with crude oil – a very unusual sight in the Northwest until just two years ago. In the event of a derailment or crash, these trains are known to increase the temperature of surrounding areas by several hundred degrees – a strange weather event by any standard. This phenomenon has become so common that the train engineers who run them actually call them “bomb trains”.

While the danger of unplanned explosions is universally recognized, the risks of strange weather, and the planned explosions that take place in our internal combustion engines, are typically less appreciated. But the connections are becoming more obvious as the figure of the oil train valiantly pulls them together.

The sudden appearance of oil trains in the Northwest is one effect of the unprecedented crusade for oil extraction in North America – one that has produced a massive wave of opposition from residents and elected officials. In Washington state alone, nine cities representing 40% of the state’s population have passed resolutions that oppose oil trains. In Alberta resistance to oil politics recently replaced a 44-year ruling party with socialists. And in Portland, anger against oil trains just smashed a city proposal to bring propane trains into the port.

In recent months rail workers have become increasingly vocal about the industry-wide safety problems that lead to fiery train accidents. They are also critical of the latest safety rules that allegedly protect the public from accidents. Rail Workers United, a coalition of rail workers and their unions, says that the best way to make trains safer is to increase worker control and self-management; they propose a host of reforms that profit-obsessed rail companies are not interested in hearing. For many rail-side communities there is a parallel interest in community control over the railroads: no fossil fuel trains are safe for them as long as trains derail and the climate unravels. Together, the two movements are calling for a better future for our railroads and our environment, and demanding more public influence to safeguard both.     (continued below)