Officials should be held accountable for decision to not use technology to make oil less explosive
By Don Nelson, Past Chair, Dakota Resource Council on Mar 12, 2015
Most
people would understand that there is a very straight line between explosive
cargo and cargo exploding. A few weeks ago, the Dakota Resource Council pointed
out the obvious that since North Dakota officials have failed to make North
Dakota oil safe enough, there is also a direct line of responsibility to them
for North Dakota oil exploding in a West Virginia train derailment.
Unfortunately,
instead of addressing the problem, some state editorial writers
repeated off the wall name-calling. Sidestepping real safety questions,
some people pushed “all or nothing” thinking and attacked the messenger —
in this case the local community group, Dakota Resource Council.....
.... the
daily spills of oil and hazardous waste, extreme wasting of gas through
flaring, threats to landowners over pipeline easements, exploding
trains of North Dakota oil and a host of crime and other problems
continue to be a new part of our daily life.
So
far, seven trains carrying North Dakota crude oil have exploded in
North America, including one in Quebec, Canada, that killed 47 people.
The response of North Dakota officials began with Helms proclaiming the
state should do a white paper to refute the “myth” that North Dakota oil
was overly explosive. Then, a train carrying North Dakota oil exploded
in Casselton, N.D., 20 miles from downtown Fargo.
Long-time
denial gave way to reluctant regulation. In December, new rules went
into effect that require oil be conditioned to 13.7 pounds per square
inch before it is loaded on to trains carrying the crude out of state.
This was not much of an improvement, since most oil producers in the
state already do that. The West Virginia explosion was pegged at 13.9
psi, almost identical to what North Dakota officials are calling good
enough. The oil that exploded in Quebec was at 9.3 psi and safe
standards are at less than 6 psi. Obviously, North Dakota still has a
long way to go.....
....The fact is North Dakota officials are allowing an explosive product to
be sent by train across the continent. DRC pointed out the obvious when
we stated that responsibility for the explosion of North Dakota oil in
West Virginia was a direct line to Gov. Jack Dalrymple, R-N.D., and
North Dakota officials who made the decision to let it happen. We
believe public officials should be held accountable for their decisions..... more here
Facing the challenges of fracking -- Science Daily
March 12, 2015 Marcellus shale extraction and its potential
negative effects on the environment is the subject of a recent
research, delving into the long term consequences fracking has on
people, animals, and the environment.
No comments:
Post a Comment